The X-King is Continentals version of an all-purpose mountain bike tire. The X-King fills the gap between the Continental Race King and Continental Mountain King. I've been using an X-King RaceSport on the front wheel for almost 2 years and have been very happy with the grip and feedback it provides. I chose the X-King because I assumed rolling resistance would be very close to the Race King RaceSport.
The Continental X-King is very similar to the Schwalbe Rocket Ron (review). Both tires have slightly wider spaced knobs when compared to a Continental Race King or Schwalbe Racing Ralph. After testing the Rocket Ron, it's clear wider spaced knobs doesn't always mean rolling resistance will be higher. Also, After testing a lot of tires, carcass construction and the rubber compound seem to be the dominant factors that influence rolling resistance.
One of the things that's obvious when you compare the Continental Speed King II (review), Race King(review) and X-King side by side is that the Speed King and Race King use the same carcass construction. The Speed King and Race King measure very close to the advertised size. The X-King on the other hand, while having the same 2.2 rating, is much smaller and clearly has a different construction. This is also obvious when unfolding the tires: The Speed King and Race King collapse under their own weight while the X-King is able to support itself and looks like a wire bead tire.
|Supplied By||Bought in store|
|New or Used||New|
|Specified Weight||555 grams|
Size and Weight Measurements
|Size and Weight Measurements (Bike Wheel: 622-17C, Pressure: 35 psi / 2.4 bar)|
|Measured Weight||564 grams|
|Measured Width Carcass||53 mm|
|Measured Width Tread||52 mm|
|Measured Height||51 mm|
|Measured Knob Height Center||2.5 mm|
|Measured Knob Height Edge||4.0 mm|
|Measured Total Thickness Sidewall||0.55 mm|
|Measured Total Thickness Center (excluding knobs)||1.80 mm|
The X-King used for this test has a weight of 564 grams, which is slightly more than the advertised weight of 555 grams. I already mentioned the X-King is small for a 2.2 sized tire. The measured width of the carcass is 53 mm, maximum width of the knobs is 52 mm, height of the tire is 51 mm.
Knob height at the center of the tread is 2.5 mm (same as Race King and Rocket Ron). The knobs at the edge of the tire have a height of 4 mm, which is higher than the Race King (2.5 mm), but slightly lower than the Rocket Ron (4.4 mm)
Rolling Resistance Test Results
|Rolling Resistance Test Results (Speed: 29 kmh / 18 mph, Load: 42.5 kg)|
|Rolling Resistance 55 psi / 3,8 Bar||20.1 Watts|
|Rolling Resistance 45 psi / 3,1 Bar||20.9 Watts|
|Rolling Resistance 35 psi / 2,4 Bar||22.8 Watts|
|Rolling Resistance 25 psi / 1,7 Bar||25.9 Watts|
|Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 55 psi / 3,8 Bar||0.00603|
|Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 45 psi / 3,1 Bar||0.00626|
|Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 35 psi / 2,4 Bar||0.00683|
|Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 25 psi / 1,7 Bar||0.00776|
After a comment on the Vittoria AKA review, I tested the X-King before and after removing the mold hairs. The X-King is one of the hairiest tires I've had in my hands, it really has a lot of mold hairs. Cutting the mold hairs resulted in a ~1 watt lower rolling resistance. All data in this review is with the mold hairs removed. I will try to retest the AKA with the mold hairs removed as well.
Rolling resistance is higher than I expected - most Continental bike tires have a very low rolling resistance. I expected the X-King to be close to the Race King and Rocket Ron, but in reality, rolling resistance is higher than both those tires. At an air pressure of 55 psi, the X-King has a 2.1 watts higher rolling resistance when compared to the Race King and 0.4 watts higher when compared to the Rocket Ron. At 25 psi, this disadvantage grows to 3.5 and 3.2 watts respectively.
While both the X-King, Race King, and Speed King are specified as having a 3/180 carcass, it seems the smaller X-King carcass doesn't have the same low rolling resistance as the carcass used in the Race King and Speed King. After comparing and observing both tires, I suspect the X-King and possibly the Mountain King are built to a more heavy-duty spec.
Puncture Resistance Test Results
|Puncture Resistance Test Result (higher is better)|
|Puncture Resistance Tread||10|
|Puncture Resistance Sidewall||6|
The results of the puncture test again indicate that the X-King carcass is stronger than the Race King carcass. The X-King scores 10 points in the tread puncture resistance test and 6 points in the sidewall puncture test. This is a bit higher than the Race King and Speed King, which both scored 7 points in the tread test and 4 points in the sidewall test.
I expected the Race King (review) and X-King to be very close in the rolling resistance and puncture resistance tests as both have a 3/180 carcass and the same compound. I also based this on the Schwalbe Racing Ralph (review) and Schwalbe Rocket Ron (review) tests -both those tires have a very similar rolling resistance. In reality, there are more differences between the X-King and Race King than just the tread pattern. The X-King has a 2-3 watts higher rolling resistance, but at the same time scores much better in the puncture tests.
2 years ago, I made the hard choice between the Continental X-King and Rocket Ron as a front tire. I opted for the X-King because I already knew the Race King had a very low rolling resistance and assumed the X-King to be very close to the Race King. I've been very happy with the X-King, didn't have any problems using it and wear is very low, but I will try a Rocket Ron when it wears out. I'll give it a rating of 4 / 5 because I do like it and it has served me 2 years without problems.
Did you like this article?
Please consider to share this article with your friends.
(click to enlarge)