Tubeless vs Latex Tube vs Butyl Tube, Rolling Resistance Compared

Published: 2014-07-25 | Jarno Bierman

Bottle of Stan's NoTubes tubeless sealant on a rolling resistance test machine

How much faster is a tubeless mountain bike tire compared to a butyl inner tube? Do latex inner tubes have less rolling resistance? And exactly how much lower is the rolling resistance of the mountain bike tire at different air pressures? These very frequently asked questions deserve an answer. In this article, I will present all data collected from tests done with a tubeless converted tire and latex and butyl inner tubes.

Check Tubeless Kits Prices at

For this comparison, I've used a Continental Race King RaceSport 29 x 2.2 mountain bike tire. This is the exact same tire I've reviewed previously, for all specifications, you can read it's review here. For this special article, I ran tests at an even lower pressure of 15 psi / 1.0 bar. The regular reviews only go down to 25 psi / 1.7 bar.

Test set up

All tests are run with the same wheel, tire, load, and speed. With the only difference being a tubeless set up, a latex inner tube or a butyl inner tube. Measurements are taken at pressures of 15, 25, 35, 45 and 55 psi.

Test conditions

Butyl inner tube set up

  • Brand: Continental
  • Model: Std Butyl 29 x 1.75 - 2.50"
  • Weight: 225 grams

Latex inner tube set up

  • Brand: Michelin
  • Model: Aircomp A4
  • Weight: 140 grams

Tubeless set up

  • Sealant: 60 ml Stans Notubes
  • Rim Strip: Notubes Rim Strip
  • Weight: Strip + Sealant = 125 grams

Test Results

Total weight

There is a weight advantage for the tubeless set up and latex tube. I only used 60 ml of sealant which was OK for running on the test bench, you might need a bit more when going off-road. I would say tubeless and latex are about equal in the weight department. It did take three days to get the Race King to seal completely, it was leaking through the sidewalls quite a bit. You definitely have to take your time for the tubeless set up.

Rolling Resistance

The line chart says it all! It's clear that tubeless mountain bike tires and latex inner tubes have less rolling resistance at the same tire pressure when compared to a butyl inner tube. It's also very clear that the difference gets bigger when lowering tire pressure. I'm surprised by the performance of the latex inner tube, at 55 psi the difference is almost zero. Dropping pressure to 15 psi results in a 1.8 watts disadvantage for the latex inner tube.

Comparing the tubeless set up to the butyl inner tube, the difference is big, at 55 psi you're already losing 2.5 watts per tire, dropping pressure to 15 psi results in a 7.7 watt per tire advantage for the tubeless set up. That's more than 15 watts extra rolling resistance for a pair of tires!

Tubeless Latex Tube Butyl Tube
Total Wheel Weight 1600 grams 1615 grams 1700 grams
Rolling Resistance 55 psi / 3.8 Bar 15.5 Watts 15.6 Watts 18.0 Watts
Rolling Resistance 45 psi / 3.1 Bar 15.8 Watts 16.0 Watts 18.7 Watts
Rolling Resistance 35 psi / 2.4 Bar 16.2 Watts 16.9 Watts 20.0 Watts
Rolling Resistance 25 psi / 1.7 Bar 17.4 Watts 18.5 Watts 22.4 Watts
Rolling Resistance 15 psi / 1.0 Bar 20.2 Watts 22.0 Watts 27.9 Watts
Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 55 psi / 3.7 Bar 0.0046 0.0046 0.0054
Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 45 psi / 3,1 Bar 0.0047 0.0048 0.0056
Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 35 psi / 2,4 Bar 0.0049 0.0051 0.0060
Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 25 psi / 1,7 Bar 0.0052 0.0055 0.0067
Rolling Resistance Coefficient (Crr) 15 psi / 1.0 Bar 0.0061 0.0066 0.0084


Tubeless sealant, Latex Tube and a Butyl tube on a rolling resistance test machine

I think I have been able to answer a lot of questions with this comparison. It's pretty clear that when you really want to get the most out of your mountain bike tires, you will have to convert them to tubeless. 10 to 15 watts more rolling resistance is a lot! If you really don't want to go tubeless, consider the latex inner tubes which will save you 8 to 12 watts for a pair of mountain bike tires when compared to butyl tubes.

On the other hand, latex tubes do have the disadvantage of not holding air as well as butyl tubes, so you will have to check your tire pressure every ride.

  • Tubeless tires have the least rolling resistance
  • Tubeless tires are the hardest to set up
  • Latex inner tubes come close to the tubeless set up
  • Latex inner tubes have to be pumped every day
  • Butyl inner tubes have much higher rolling resistance
  • Butyl inner tubes are low maintenance

What about ultra-light butyl tubes?

Some brands have ultra-light butyl mountain bike tubes, which have a weight of about 150-160 grams for the 29-inch version. My estimate is that the rolling resistance of these tubes falls somewhere in between the latex tube and the 225 grams butyl tube.

Do you want to convert to Tubeless?

I was skeptical about tubeless wheels before converting my standard wheels to tubeless. After using it for a while and doing these tests, I'm a big fan of tubeless systems now. Converting my wheels was way easier than I expected it would be. If you have standard rims as well, I recommend just grabbing a mountain bike tubeless kit. It comes with everything you need for 2 wheels (rim strip or tape, valves, valve tool, sealant).

Check Tubeless Kits Prices at

Did you like this article?

Please consider to share this article with your friends.

Or Like/Follow us on Facebook or Twitter

Bottle of Stans NoTubes tubeless sealant on a rolling resistance test machine

(click to enlarge)

Chain Reaction Cycles Clearance

Chain Reaction Cycles MTB Tire Clearance - Up to 50% Off

Free worldwide shipping, Large selection, Up to 50% off View MTB Tire Deals

Leave a comment

Get updates on new articles