Panaracer R'Air Inner Tube Review

Published: 2015-01-02 by Jarno Bierman
Facebook like buttonTwitter like buttonEmail share button

Panaracer R

After the Schwalbe One Tubeless vs Clincher article where I compared road bike inner tubes, I got a message from Alban Lorenzini who told me that the Panaracer R'Air light butyl tube might have less rolling resistance than a latex tube. Alban ordered the inner tube and had it delivered to me. Take a look at his interesting blog: Alban Lorenzini Coaching Thank you, Alban!

Panaracer claims the R'Air range of inner tubes to give all the ride advantages of latex with all the functionality of butyl tubes. This is achieved by using a super flexible and leak-resistant butyl compound. Claimed weight is 67 grams, this fits the light butyl tube category (65-75 grams). Most standard road bike inner tubes have a weight of 100 grams.


Test set up

For this test I've used the same Schwalbe One clincher, I've used for the Schwalbe One Tubeless vs Clincher article. I retested the standard 100 grams Continental inner tube on the same day to make sure results would be consistent (results were within 0.3 watts). Results are purely the rolling resistance of the inner tubes and exclude the rolling resistance of the Schwalbe One.

Test conditions

Inner Tubes

  • Panaracer R'Air: 70 grams 700x18-23C
  • Latex tube: 80 grams Michelin AirComp A1
  • Light tube: 70 grams Continental Race 28 Light
  • Standard tube: 100 grams Continental Race 28

Test Results

Total weight

While Panaracer claims this tube to have a weight of 67 grams, real measured weight is 70 grams.

Rolling Resistance

The Panaracer R'Air can't beat the latex tube in the rolling resistance test and is about equal to the Continental Race 28 Light which has the same weight and is also made of a butyl compound.

Race 28
AirComp A1
Race 28
Inner Tube Weight 70 grams 70 grams 80 grams 100 grams
Rolling Resistance 120 psi / 8.3 Bar 2.3 Watts 2.3 Watts 1.6 Watts 3.1 Watts
Rolling Resistance 100 psi / 6.9 Bar 2.7 Watts 2.6 Watts 1.8 Watts 3.5 Watts
Rolling Resistance 80 psi / 5.5 Bar 3.3 Watts 3.1 Watts 2.3 Watts 4.2 Watts
Rolling Resistance 60 psi / 4.1 Bar 3.4 Watts 3.6 Watts 2.4 Watts 4.8 Watts
CRR 120 psi / 8.3 Bar 0.00069 0.00069 0.00048 0.00093
CRR 100 psi / 6.9 Bar 0.00081 0.00078 0.00054 0.00105
CRR 80 psi / 5.5 Bar 0.00099 0.00093 0.00069 0.00126
CRR 60 psi / 4.1 Bar 0.00102 0.00108 0.00072 0.00144


Continental Light and Standard and a Michelin latex road bike inner tube

Unfortunately, the Panaracer does not meet the high expectations. Rolling resistance isn't lower than a Michelin latex tube and seems to be on par with the Continental Race 28 Light which has the same weight and is also made of a butyl compound. If you really want low rolling resistance, there is nothing that beats latex.

Because latex inner tubes are well known for the inability to hold air for long periods of time, I wanted to know how well the Panaracer kept its pressure. I inflated the tire to 100 psi and let it sit for 3 weeks. After 3 weeks, air pressure dropped to 69 psi. This means you still have to check air pressure and re-inflate every week. This is a bit less work than latex tubes which you have to check every day.


Get updates on new articles